The order appealed from should be affirmed, except that upon the original examination plaintiff was entitled to a categorical answer to the question addressed to defendant's witness Smith: "Was there any difference in composition or construction between the material which is referred to in Plaintiff's Exhibit 15a and the material which is referred to in Plaintiff's Exhibits 23a and 24a?" The answer given was "yes, minor differences." The characterization "minor" was a conclusion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.