1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 96 F.Supp.
  5. 96 F.Supp. 919 (1951)
 

LOVE v. UNITED STATES

No. 48946.

96 F.Supp. 919 (1951)

LOVE et al. v. UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims.

May 1, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert C. Cotten, Jr., Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs. Moyle & Wanlass, Washington, D. C., were on the briefs.

John A. Rees, Washington, D. C., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen. Theron Lamar Caudle, for defendant. Andrew D. Sharpe and Ellis N. Slack, Washington, D. C., were on the brief.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, MADDEN and HOWELL, Judges.

JONES, Chief Judge, delivered the opinion of the court:

The plaintiffs, a family group, sue for a refund of a portion of the income taxes paid for the calendar years 1940 and 1941.

It has been stipulated that if plaintiffs are entitled to recover the aggregate amounts should be $5,170.62 for 1940 and $4,128.87 for 1941.

The plaintiffs are members of a partnership or joint venture known as the Love Group...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases