1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.
  4. 301 N.Y.
  5. 301 N.Y. 651 (1950)
 

AMBURSEN ENG'G CORP. v. FOMENTO INDUS. Y MERCANTIL

301 N.Y. 651 (1950)

Ambursen Engineering Corporation, Appellant and Respondent, v. Fomento Industrial Y Mercantil, S. A., et al., Respondents and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided July 11, 1950

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Broadman Epstein, Francis X. Conway and Joseph Markle for plaintiff, appellant and respondent.

Monroe H. Collenburg, Jerome S. Hess, Walter M. Hinkle and Frank Rashap for defendants, respondents and appellants.

LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ., concur.

Per Curiam.

A review of the record persuades us that the weight of evidence supports the trial court's finding that the value of plaintiff's services vis-à-vis the hydroelectric project — the subject of the fifth cause of action — was the sum of $50,000 rather than the amount of $35,000 found by the Appellate Division. Accordingly, the judgment of the Appellate Division is modified to the extent of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases