1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 10 N.J.
  5. 10 N.J. Super. 82 (1950)
 

HOLLANDER v. SMITH & SMITH

10 N.J. Super. 82 (1950)

76 A.2d 697

NETTIE HOLLANDER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SMITH & SMITH, AND OTHERS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 10, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Bernard Freedman argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Koehler, Augenblick & Freedman, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph Coult, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent, Smith & Smith.

Mr. Jerome C. Eisenberg argued the cause for the respondents, Robert M. Taafe and John B. Hannon (Mr. Samuel D. Williams, attorney, and Mr. Israel Spicer, on the brief).

Before Judges JACOBS, BIGELOW and JAYNE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BIGELOW, J.A.D.

The plaintiff, a widow in her late 60's or early 70's, brings this action against Smith & Smith, a corporation, and its servants, John B. Hannon and Robert M. Taafe. She demands compensation for injuries which she suffered allegedly through the negligence of the defendants. Pursuant to the jury's verdict, judgment was entered in favor of the defendants, and she appeals.

Appellant was suffering from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases