1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 88 F.Supp.
  5. 88 F.Supp. 809 (1950)
 

UNITED STATES v. UNIVIS LENS CO.

88 F.Supp. 809 (1950)

UNITED STATES v. UNIVIS LENS CO. et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

February 10, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Melville C. Williams, Malcolm A. Hoffmann, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, John R. Niesley, Trial Attorney, Great Neck, N.Y., for petitioner.

Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City, Alfred McCormack, New York City, Francis Dean Schnacke, Dayton, Ohio, Albert Rosenblum, New York City, of counsel, for respondents.

GALSTON, District Judge.

It is charged by the petitioner that the respondents have violated the Final Judgment entered in this court on September 28, 1942, in an action wherein The Univis Lens Company (hereinafter referred to as Univis) and others were adjudged to have violated sections 1 and 3 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 3. The Government filed its petition in procuring an order to show cause why the respondents should not be adjudged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases