1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 100 F.Supp.
  5. 100 F.Supp. 713 (1950)
 

BRUEN v. HUFF

Civ. No. 7169.

100 F.Supp. 713 (1950)

BRUEN et al. v. HUFF et al.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

September 24, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Frease, Canton, Ohio, Albert G. McCaleb, Chicago, Ill., and Brown, Critchlow, Flick & Peckham, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Francis J. Klempay, Youngstown, Ohio, Wm. J. Ruano, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendants.

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

This action is brought pursuant to R.S. Section 4919, 35 U.S.C.A. § 67, by the owners of United States Patent No. 2,340,862, the Bruen patent, against the defendants, Huff, Troy and the Roto-Card File Company, Inc., for alleged patent infringement. Diebold, Incorporated (Diebold), the exclusive licensee under the patent, has been impleaded as a party-plaintiff. The defendants set up counterclaims for a declaratory judgment to have the patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases