1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 90 F.Supp.
  5. 90 F.Supp. 676 (1950)
 

LISLE MILLS v. ARKAY INFANTS WEAR

Civ. 9580.

90 F.Supp. 676 (1950)

LISLE MILLS, Inc. v. ARKAY INFANTS WEAR, Inc. et al.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

April 4, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lackenbach & Hirschman, New York City, for plaintiff (Armand E. Lackenbach, New York City, of counsel).

Harry Price, New York City, for defendants.

KENNEDY, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves for an order (1) to strike a jury demand filed by the defendant Arkay Infants Wear, Inc. (Arkay), (2) to strike various paragraphs of defendants' answer and counterclaim, and (3) for summary judgment in plaintiff's favor. Defendant Arkay moves to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff is disabled to sue because, while doing business in the state of New York, it has not complied with General Corporation Law of New...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases