1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 88 F.Supp.
  5. 88 F.Supp. 677 (1950)
 

TRUNCALE v. BLUMBERG

88 F.Supp. 677 (1950)

TRUNCALE v. BLUMBERG et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

January 31, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Millard & Greene, New York City, for plaintiff. Milton Pollack, New York City, of counsel.

H. G. Pickering, New York City, Mudge, Stern, Williams & Tucker, New York City, for defendant Clifford Work. John Wallis and Robert E. Walsh, New York City, of counsel.

Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin & Krim, New York City (Louis Nizer and Daniel Glass, New York City, of counsel), for defendant William A. Scully.

Adolph Schimel, New York City (C. S. Landau, New York City, of counsel), for defendant Universal Pictures Co., Inc.

RIFKIND, District Judge.

In the following discussion I shall assume familiarity with the decisions of Judge Medina in Truncale v. Blumberg, D.C.S.D. N.Y. 1948, 80 F.Supp. 387, and D.C., 8 F.R.D. 492. See also Truncale v. Blumberg, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1948, 83 F.Supp. 628. These narrate the background facts against which the specific issues are herein decided.

The action was brought by a stockholder...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases