1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 93 F.Supp.
  5. 93 F.Supp. 604 (1950)
 

ROBERTS v. CURTIS

Civ. A. No. 2192-50.

93 F.Supp. 604 (1950)

ROBERTS et al. v. CURTIS et al.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

October 5, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry W. Goldberg, of Washington, D. C., for the defendants, for the motion.

John H. Connaughton, of Washington, D. C., for the plaintiffs, opposed.

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

This is an action for damages for the breach of a restrictive covenant not to sell certain property to members of the colored race. For a great many years covenants of this type were regarded as valid in this jurisdiction and were enforced by the courts.

In the cases of Hurd v. Hodge, 334 U.S. 24, 25, 68 S.Ct. 847, 92 L.Ed 1187, and Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1, 68...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases