1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 93 F.Supp.
  5. 93 F.Supp. 584 (1950)
 

BERRY v. KEMLINE METAL PRODUCTS CO.

Civ. A. No. 8649.

93 F.Supp. 584 (1950)

BERRY et al. v. KEMLINE METAL PRODUCTS CO., Inc.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

August 1, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Beaman & Patch, and Townsend F. Beaman, all of Jackson, Mich., for plaintiffs.

Zachary T. Wobensmith, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.

This is an action based upon patent infringement and unfair competition.

I

Patent Infringement.

Three patents are involved, Berry, 1,906,361 (claims 4 and 5), Kroenlein, 2,458,863 (claims 1 and 3) and Hardick, 2,458,850 (claim 1). The patents are all for toy cash registers which are much the same thing as commercial cash registers, but reduced in size, greatly simplified and inexpensively constructed.

In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases