1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 92 F.Supp.
  5. 92 F.Supp. 575 (1950)
 

SARGENT BARGE LINE v. THE OVERBROOK

Nos. 18236, 18502.

92 F.Supp. 575 (1950)

SARGENT BARGE LINE, Inc. v. THE OVERBROOK et al. REFINED SYRUPS & SUGARS, Inc. v. THE WILLIAM T. ROUSE et al. THE TRENTON.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

May 8, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mahar & Mason, New York City, proctors for Sargent Barge Line, Inc., by Frank C. Mason, New York City, advocate.

Macklin, Speer, Hanan & McKernan, New York City, proctors for Refined Syrups & Sugars, Inc., by Charles J. Carroll, Jr., New York City, advocate.

Burlinham, Veeder, Clark & Hupper, New York City, proctors for tugs Overbrook and Trenton and Pennsylvania R. Co., by Frederic Conger, New York City, advocate.

INCH, District Judge.

These two actions arise out of the sinking of the barge William T. Rouse (hereinafter called "The Rouse"), with its cargo of pulverized coal, while moored at the 58th Street pier in the North River, at about 11 A.M. on August 6, 1946. One suit is by Sargent Barge Line, Inc. (hereinafter called "Sargent"), as owner of The Rouse, against the tugs Overbrook and Trenton, for damage to the barge caused by the sinking, the salvage expense in raising...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases