1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.
  4. 276 A.D.
  5. 276 A.D. 353 (1950)
 

BOBOWSKI v. CITY OF NEW YORK

276 A.D. 353 (1950)

Edward Bobowski, as Administrator of The Estate of Stanley Bobowski, Deceased, Appellant-Respondent, v. City of New York, Respondent-Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

January 31, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred Iscol of counsel (William F. Miller and Seymour B. Quel with him on the brief; John P. McGrath, Corporation Counsel), for respondent-appellant.

Samuel F. Berkon of counsel (Bernard Meyerson with him on the brief), for appellant-respondent.

PECK, P. J., COHN, CALLAHAN and SHIENTAG, JJ., concur; DORE, J., concurs in result.

Per Curiam.

Order denying motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence is affirmed. A motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence may only be made at Special Term and on a settled case, unless waived (Russell v. Randall, 123 N.Y. 436; McIver v. Hallen, 50 App. Div. 441), and this rule applies to a jury case as well as to a nonjury case (Civ. Prac. Act, §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases