1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 90 F.Supp.
  5. 90 F.Supp. 531 (1950)
 

MENASHE v. SUTTON

90 F.Supp. 531 (1950)

MENASHE v. SUTTON et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

May 10, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ferris & Adams, New York City, for plaintiff.

Samuel Hochstein, New York City, Mordecai Konowitz, New York City, of counsel, for defendants.

RIFKIND, District Judge.

"This tangled case" continues to snag as it ravels. U. S. ex rel. Sutton v. Mulcahy, 2 Cir., 1948, 169 F.2d 94, 96. It has already received considerable judicial attention. See Menashe v. Sutton, D.C. S.D.N.Y.1947, 71 F.Supp. 103; U.S. ex rel. Sutton v. Mulcahy, supra. Several other motions in this action are now pending before other judges.

The present motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases