1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 90 F.Supp.
  5. 90 F.Supp. 442 (1950)
 

ASSELTA v. 149 MADISON AVENUE CORPORATION

90 F.Supp. 442 (1950)

ASSELTA et al. v. 149 MADISON AVENUE CORPORATION et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

May 9, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Duberstein & Nimkoff, New York City (Frederick E. Weinberg, Wilbur Duberstein, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Joseph Caine, McLanahan, Merritt & Ingraham, New York City (Robert R. Bruce, John B. Tittmann, John J. Boyle, New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

RIFKIND, District Judge.

This action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., has already had a long career. It appears now to be well launched on another of perhaps equal duration.

The action was commenced on December 10, 1943. On November 20, 1944, fourteen days after the decision in Walling v. Helmerich & Payne, 1944, 323 U.S. 37, 65 S.Ct. 11, 89 L.Ed. 29 and by the light of that opinion, plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases