1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 190 Or.
  5. 190 Or. 332 (1950)
 

CONZELMANN v. N.W.P. & D. PROD. CO.

190 Or. 332 (1950)

225 P.2d 757

CONZELMANN AND CONZELMANN v. NORTHWEST POULTRY & DAIRY PRODUCTS CO. AND NORTON SPATH, ADMINISTRATRIX, v. NORTHWEST POULTRY & DAIRY PRODUCTS CO. AND NORTON

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed December 19, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur S. Vosburg argued the cause for appellants. On the briefs were Flegel, Vosburg, Joss & Hedlund, of Portland.

Robert M. Kerr and Stuart W. Hill argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Kerr & Hill, of Portland.

Before LUSK, Chief Justice, and BRAND, LATOURETTE, WARNER and TOOZE, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

TOOZE, J.

The above entitled causes are actions for deceit. In one, Erich F. Conzelmann and Elizabeth Conzelmann, doing business as Conzelmann and Conzelmann, are plaintiffs, and Northwest Poultry & Dairy Products Co., a corporation, and C.W. Norton are defendants; in the other, Martha E. Spath, administratrix of the estate of Leonard W. Spath, and Martha E. Spath are plaintiffs, and the cause of action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases