1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 3 N.J.
  5. 3 N.J. 494 (1950)
 

PROTOMASTRO v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF HOBOKEN

3 N.J. 494 (1950)

70 A.2d 873

GUSTAV PROTOMASTRO, MARIE TIMONEY, VERA PALMA, LOUISE CASILLI, AMADIO DePASQUALE, FORTUNE DePASQUALE, CIRO SELLITTI AND TERESA SELLITTI, JOSEPHINE POLICASTRO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN (ALSO KNOWN AS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF HOBOKEN), AND AVENEL INDUSTRIAL REALTY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 9, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edward Stover argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Nicholas S. Schloeder argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Levenson & Levenson, attorneys for Avenel Industrial Realty Corporation; Mr. Dominick H. Rinaldi, attorney for Board of Adjustment of the City of Hoboken).

The opinion of the court was delivered by CASE, J.

This appeal from a judgment of the Law Division of the Superior Court to the Appellate Division was certified to us on our own motion. It concerns a determination by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Hoboken granting a variance from the city zoning ordinance.

The building inspector of the City of Hoboken rejected the application of Avenel Industrial Realty Corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases