1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 90 F.Supp.
  5. 90 F.Supp. 392 (1950)
 

STUART v. CREEL

90 F.Supp. 392 (1950)

STUART et al. v. CREEL.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

May 18, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Weisman, Celler, Quinn, Allan & Spett, New York City, Samuel R. Rudey, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiffs.

James Randall Creel, New York City, pro se.

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

The Court has before it a motion by the plaintiffs to remand this action to the City Court of the City of New York from which it was removed on the filing of the defendant's petition. The action was removed to this court pursuant to Section 1441(a) of Title 28 U.S.C.A., which permits a civil action brought in a state court to be removed by the defendant, if the district court has original...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases