1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 92 F.Supp.
  5. 92 F.Supp. 348 (1950)
 

RASKE v. RASKE

Civ. A. No. 3231.

92 F.Supp. 348 (1950)

RASKE v. RASKE et ux.

United States District Court D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.

August 1, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles F. Noonan, Henry Halladay and Horace Hitch, all of Minneapolis, Minn. (Dorsey, Colman, Barker, Scott & Barber, of Minneapolis, Minn., of counsel), for defendant Minnie Raske, in support of the motion.

Ben W. Palmer, of Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff, in opposition thereto.

NORDBYE, Chief Judge.

The above cause came before the Court on a motion for an order granting defendant Minnie Raske a new trial pursuant to Rules 59 and 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

This action was one for alienation of affections. Plaintiff was the wife of defendants' son. The action was tried by this Court and a jury at the March, 1950, general term of court. The Court directed a verdict in favor of the father, defendant Henry...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases