1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 153 Ohio
  5. 153 Ohio St. 287 (1950)
 

STATE, EX REL. HOUGH v. COURT.

No. 31729.

153 Ohio St. 287 (1950)

THE STATE, EX REL., HOUGH ET AL., v. MUNICIPAL COURT OF CLEVELAND ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 22, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Woodle & Wachtel, for relators.

Mr. Lee C. Howley, director of law, and Mr. Robert J. Selzer, for respondents.

BY THE COURT.

From the facts alleged in the pleadings it is apparent that the instant proceeding is an attempt to convert a proceeding in prohibition into a second proceeding on appeal. A writ of prohibition not being available as a substitute for an appeal (32 Ohio Jurisprudence, 586, Section 24, citing, inter alia, State, ex rel. Burtzlaff, v. Vickery et al., Judges, 121 Ohio St. 49, 166 N. E., 894, and State, ex rel. Brickell, v. Roach,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases