1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Minn.
  4. 230 Minn.
  5. 230 Minn. 203 (1950)
 

DAHLQUIST v. MINNEAPOLIS & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY CO.

No. 35,023.

230 Minn. 203 (1950)

ALBERT DAHLQUIST v. MINNEAPOLIS & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

March 3, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brenner & Bouchard, for appellant.

C.W. Wright, John C. DeMar, Richard Musenbrock, and William J. Powell, for respondent.

LORING, CHIEF JUSTICE.

In the preceding opinion, we held that defendant was not entitled to judgment notwithstanding the verdict because of failure to move for a directed verdict at the close of all the testimony. M.S.A. 605.06. Dahlquist v. M. & St. L. Ry. Co. 230 Minn. 201, 41 N.W.2d 586. Since that decision was filed, the parties have presented a stipulation that the case be remanded to the trial court for correction of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases