MATTER OF KAPLAN v. WIRTH & BIRNBAUM


301 N.Y. 121 (1950)

In the Matter of the Claim of Max Kaplan, Respondent, v. Wirth & Birnbaum, Employer, and Special Fund for Reopened Cases, Appellant. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent. In the Matter of the Claim of John R. Houston, Respondent, v. William L. Mantha Company, Inc., Employer, and Special Fund for Reopened Cases, Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided June 1, 1950


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Cullen for appellants.

Abraham Markhoff for Max Kaplan, claimant-respondent.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (Daniel Polansky, Wendell P. Brown and Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE and FULD, JJ., concur.


FROESSEL, J.

These companion appeals present a common question of law, certified to us by the Appellate Division in each case, as follows: "Under the facts in this case, does the Board have the power and jurisdiction to reopen the claim against the Special Fund for Reopened Cases under the Compensation Law?"

The facts in each case are not in controversy. The Kaplan claim, based on an injury (hernia), which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases