1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 89 F.Supp.
  5. 89 F.Supp. 321 (1950)
 

PENNER INSTALLATION CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES

No. 47267.

89 F.Supp. 321 (1950)

PENNER INSTALLATION CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims.

April 3, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert Foreman, New York City, M. Carl Levine, Morgulas & Foreman, New York City, were on the brief, for plaintiff.

John R. Franklin, Washington, D. C., with whom was Assistant Attorney General H. G. Morison, for the defendant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, MADDEN and HOWELL, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for a new trial in this case is allowed, the conclusion of law and judgment heretofore entered is withdrawn, and plaintiff's petition will be dismissed, inasmuch as there is no showing in this case that the contracting officer and head of the department acted arbitrarily, capriciously, or that his decision was so grossly erroneous as to imply bad faith. It...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases