The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
The petitioner is not unlawfully restrained of his liberty by the sentence imposed on September 17, 1946, which commitment is not challenged in this proceeding. He is therefore in the lawful custody of the warden.
The sentence of October 23, 1946, may be voidable but it may not be attacked by habeas corpus as a substitute for appeal. Ex...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.