1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 91 F.Supp.
  5. 91 F.Supp. 298 (1950)
 

LO BUE v. UNITED STATES

No. 179-22.

91 F.Supp. 298 (1950)

LO BUE v. UNITED STATES et al.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

June 20, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Vincent Keogh, United States Attorney, Brooklyn, N. Y., Proctor for Respondent, by Leavenworth Colby, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, Barry, Wainwright, Thacher & Symmers, New York City, of counsel.

John P. Smith, New York City, Proctor for Respondent-Impleaded, Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City, of counsel, by John L. Quinlan, New York City.

GALSTON, District Judge.

There remains for decision the issues raised between respondent and the respondent-impleaded, see Lo Bue v. United States, D. C., 75 F.Supp. 154, 156, in which it was said: "After the trial had been concluded, and while this opinion was being drafted, the respondent moved to amend its impleading petition in order to develop fully its right of indemnity under the contract between the respondent and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases