1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 6 N.J.
  5. 6 N.J. Super. 359 (1950)
 

MIDLER v. HEINOWITZ

6 N.J. Super. 359 (1950)

71 A.2d 540

HARRY L. MIDLER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ABRAHAM M. HEINOWITZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 23, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph Kraemer, attorney for and of counsel with plaintiff-appellant, argued the cause.

Mr. Andrew B. Crummy, attorney for and of counsel with defendant-respondent, argued the cause.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, COLIE and EASTWOOD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, J.A.D.

Plaintiff, Harry L. Midler, instituted an action in the former Court of Chancery against defendant, Abraham M. Heinowitz, for an accounting. Midler appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court, Chancery Division, on the ground that the court erred (1) in sustaining defendant's exception No. 3 to the Master's findings, thereby refusing to charge the joint venture with an additional 169,352 lbs. of high speed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases