1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 4 N.J.
  5. 4 N.J. 357 (1950)
 

CITY OF CAMDEN v. SOUTH JERSEY PORT COMMISSION

4 N.J. 357 (1950)

73 A.2d 55

THE CITY OF CAMDEN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SOUTH JERSEY PORT COMMISSION, SOMETIMES REFERRED TO AS SOUTH JERSEY PORT DISTRICT, A PUBLIC CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 24, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Norman Heine argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. John J. Crean, attorney).

Mr. Laurence L. Crispin and Mr. J. Raymond Tiffany argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney General).

The opinion of the court was delivered by VANDERBILT, C.J.

The South Jersey Port District comprising the counties of Burlington, Cape May, Camden, Cumberland, Gloucester, Mercer and Salem, was created by P.L. 1926, Chapter 336 (R.S. 12:11-1 et seq.), and thereby declared a public corporation and awarded the usual corporate powers. A Port Commission was also created to serve as the governing body of the district and was given the power to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases