1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.
  4. 277 A.D.
  5. 277 A.D. 60 (1950)
 

MATTER OF BAIRD v. STATE LIQUOR AUTH.

277 A.D. 60 (1950)

In the Matter of Cecil Baird, Petitioner, v. State Liquor Authority, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 13, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel Kaufman for petitioner.

Harry F. Karst of counsel (Alvin McKinley Sylvester, attorney), for respondent.

PECK, P. J., VAN VOORHIS and SHIENTAG, JJ., concur; GLENNON and COHN, JJ., dissent and vote to confirm.

Per Curiam.

If there is substantial evidence of competent probative force to sustain the conclusion of the State Liquor Authority, its determination is to be confirmed. "Unless it is made to appear that there is no substantial reason for the exercise of discretion, the courts will not interfere" (Matter of Restaurants, etc., Longchamps v. O'Connell, 271 App. Div. 684, 687, affd. 296 N.Y. 888; Matter of Fiore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases