1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 93 F.Supp.
  5. 93 F.Supp. 239 (1950)
 

INFANTE v. MOORE-McCORMACK LINES

No. 115 of 1947.

93 F.Supp. 239 (1950)

INFANTE et ux. v. MOORE-McCORMACK LINES, Inc.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

October 16, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stark & Goldstein, Philadelphia, Pa., for libellants.

Krusen, Evans & Shaw, Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent.

CLARY, District Judge.

The libellant's sole objection to the Order of Dismissal entered in this matter, D.C., 91 F.Supp. 71, appears to be that the Admiralty Rules do not provide for the entry of summary judgment and that the only cause for dismissal of a libel is that set forth in Rule 38, 28 U.S.C.A. Libellant's position may therefore be summed up as stating that the provisions of the Admiralty Rules limit the power of the court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases