1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 90 F.Supp.
  5. 90 F.Supp. 184 (1950)
 

CHASE v. RIEVE

90 F.Supp. 184 (1950)

CHASE et al. v. RIEVE et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

April 14, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neuburger, Shapiro, Rabinowitz & Boudin, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Arthur J. Goldberg, Thomas E. Harris, David E. Feller, Washington, D. C., for defendants.

RIFKIND, District Judge.

Plaintiffs' motion for a temporary injunction and defendants' cross-motion to dismiss the action present many of the issues considered in Tisa v. Potofsky, D. C. 90 F.Supp. 1175. Familiarity with the opinion in that case will be assumed.

The action is for a permanent injunction and declaratory judgment. Its purpose is to restrain the defendants from taking steps to effect the expulsion of United Office and Professional Workers of America...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases