1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 90 F.Supp.
  5. 90 F.Supp. 172 (1950)
 

GAVIN v. HUDSON & MANHATTAN R. CO.

Civ. Nos. 10362, 10496, 11091.

90 F.Supp. 172 (1950)

GAVIN v. HUDSON & MANHATTAN R. CO. KNOBLOCH v. HUDSON & MANHATTAN R. CO. EMMA et al. v. HUDSON & MANHATTAN R. CO.

United States District Court D. New Jersey.

May 2, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Laird, Newark, N. J., for J. Gavin.

David Roskein, Newark, N. J., for W. Knobloch and Mary Emma and Frank Emma.

Markley & Broadhurst, by Charles W. Broadhurst, Jersey City, N. J., for defendant.

FAKE, Chief Judge.

The issues here arise on motions to dismiss for lack of diversity of citizenship.

The record consists of the complaints, the answers and two exhibits. The complaints alleged that plaintiffs are citizens of the State of New Jersey, and the named defendant is a corporation and a citizen of the State of New York. The answers are not worded in the same language. In the Gavin case the answer denies that the named defendant is a corporation of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases