1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 91 F.Supp.
  5. 91 F.Supp. 159 (1950)
 

HOAGUE-SPRAGUE CORPORATION v. BIRD & SON

91 F.Supp. 159 (1950)

HOAGUE-SPRAGUE CORPORATION v. BIRD & SON, Inc.

United States District Court D. Massachusetts.

April 6, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George P. Dike, George P. Towle, Jr., Dike, Calver & Porter, all of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Kenway, Jenny, Witter & Hildreth, Melvin R. Jenney, Richard R. Hildreth, Richard Cotter, all of Boston, Mass., for defendant.

McCARTHY, District Judge.

Hoague-Sprague Corporation, doing business at Lynn, Massachusetts, and Bird & Son, Inc., doing business at Walpole, Massachusetts, are competitors in the shoe box-blank industry. Both supply shoe manufacturers or shoe box manufacturers with flat box-blanks which are then formed into a completed shoe box. This latter operation is usually effected by means of box-forming machines which either automatically or semi-automatically bend, glue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases