1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 92 F.Supp.
  5. 92 F.Supp. 115 (1950)
 

STOTT BRIQUET CO. v. NEW YORK CENT. R. CO.

Civ. Nos. 26000, 26001, 27250.

92 F.Supp. 115 (1950)

STOTT BRIQUET CO., Inc. et al. v. NEW YORK CENT. R. CO. STOTT BRIQUET CO., Inc. et al. v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO. STOTT BRIQUET CO., Inc., v. NEW YORK CENT. R. CO. et al.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

June 20, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip H. Porter, Madison, Wis., James B. Dolphin, Cleveland, Ohio, for Stott Briquet Co., Inc.

Paul Lamb, Cleveland, Ohio, for New York Cent. R. Co.

Charles F. Clarke, Jr., Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for Pennsylvania R. Co.

JONES, Chief Judge.

These are three actions now before the court on identical motions to dismiss because the statutory limitation period has elapsed.

In each case coal was carried by rail from Pennsylvania to lake ports on Lake Erie. The coal was then shipped by lake vessel to Superior, Wisconsin where plaintiff, Stott Briquet Company, processed the coal into briquets and shipped the finished product on different railroads into the western states.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases