1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 91 F.Supp.
  5. 91 F.Supp. 75 (1950)
 

MAYTAG ATLANTIC CO. v. HAMILTON MFG. CO.

Civ. A. No. 10338.

91 F.Supp. 75 (1950)

MAYTAG ATLANTIC CO., Inc. v. HAMILTON MFG. CO.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

June 13, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Moses Block, New York City, for plaintiff (Hyman Frank, New York City, of counsel).

Mitchell, Capron, Marsh, Angulo & Cooney, New York City, for defendant (Earle J. Starkey, New York City, of counsel).

BYERS, District Judge.

These are cross motions for summary judgment under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 56, 28 U.S.C.A. The defendant's being addressed to the First, Third and Fourth causes as pleaded. The plaintiff's is in effect for judgment as to the Second cause of action pleaded in the complaint.

The plaintiff's claim is based upon its status as a "franchised distributor" of defendant's products at...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases