1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 91 F.Supp.
  5. 91 F.Supp. 49 (1950)
 

MERRIMAC HAT CORP. v. CROWN OVERALL MFG. CO.

91 F.Supp. 49 (1950)

MERRIMAC HAT CORPORATION v. CROWN OVERALL MFG. CO. et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

April 18, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Price, New York City, for plaintiff.

Klein, Alexander & Cooper, New York City (Clifton Cooper, New York City, Frank Zugelter, Cincinnati, Ohio, and Stanley E. Zimmerman, New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

S. H. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

Defendant Crown Overall Manufacturing Co. moves to dismiss the amended complaint on the grounds that it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter or, in the exercise of its discretion, should not entertain it.

The amended complaint purports to set forth three causes of action. The first alleges that plaintiff has been manufacturing hats and hat bodies since...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases