It was within the province of the trial court, after the return of the verdict of guilty, to find that appellant had been so armed and, since the factor of the arming is not a part of the crime, appellant was not subjected to double jeopardy. (People v. Krennan, 264 N.Y. 108; People v. Caruso, 249 N.Y. 302; People v. Paradiso, 248 N.Y. 123; People ex rel. Fiannaca v. Hunt, 257 App. Div. 910.) In any event, coram nobis does not lie to correct...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.