The controversy is really between the State Fund and the Special Fund for Reopened Cases. It seems clear from the record that claimant did everything within her power to bring to the attention of those concerned the fact that she sought to reopen her case, well within the statutory time limits prescribed by section 25-a of the Workmen's Compensation Law. Under all of the circumstances the board was justified in finding that the case was reopened October 9, 1946, which was...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.