As so modified, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The allowance for counsel fee was improperly incorporated in the judgment because it is remuneration for past services. (Beadleston v. Beadleston, 103 N.Y. 402; Stevens v. Stevens, 214 App. Div. 785; Fisher v. Fisher, 223...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.