The issue of employment was sharply contested, but there was, in our opinion, sufficient evidence to make it a question of fact for the jury. However, proof as to the services claimed to have been rendered was too vague and general in its nature to permit a fair appraisal of value to be made by the jury. Moreover, the submission of the case to the jury by the Trial Justice, was inadequate, and contradictory in some respects. The jury was entitled to a clear and explicit charge...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.