This employer, although a farmer, was engaged in a lumbering operation on land which he neither owned nor rented, quite distinct and apart from his usual farm operations. It was in this operation that claimant, who was not a regular farm hand, was engaged when injured. The employer was, therefore, subject to the Workmen's Compensation Law. The evidence is sufficient to sustain the board's findings that an employer-employee relationship existed and that claimant was acting...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.