Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
The papers on which the warrant of attachment was granted are insufficient to show that the moving defendant entered into the contract with the defendant Wilhelm Ernest Heinrich Biesterfeld, etc., for the benefit of the plaintiff as alleged in the complaint.
Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.