1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 97 F.Supp.
  5. 97 F.Supp. 1012 (1950)
 

MILLICAN v. GEE

Civ. A. No. 7404.

97 F.Supp. 1012 (1950)

MILLICAN v. GEE et al.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

October 9, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas H. Cauley and James J. Burns, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

H. E. McCamey (of Dickie, Robinson & McCamey), Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendants Gee & Kidd.

H. A. Robinson (of Dickie, Robinson & McCamey), Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant A. & A. Machinery Corp.

MARSH, District Judge.

In this case the plaintiff avers that the defendant Gee is an employee, jointly or severally, of the defendant, Kidd, and the additional defendant, A. and A. Machinery Corporation. The latter moves to dismiss the action or quash the service because it, being a New York corporation, was brought in under the Pennsylvania Nonresident Motor Vehicle Act,1 and is not amenable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases