1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 92 F.Supp.
  5. 92 F.Supp. 1016 (1950)
 

ORO FINA CONSOLIDATED MINES v. UNITED STATES

No. 49486.

92 F.Supp. 1016 (1950)

ORO FINA CONSOLIDATED MINES, Inc. v. UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims.

October 2, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. H. Martin, Washington, D. C., George A. Nugent, Washington, D. C., on the brief, for plaintiff.

Melvin Richter, Washington, D. C., Newell A. Clapp, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, MADDEN and HOWELL, Judges.

LITTLETON, Judge.

Plaintiff's petition alleges that it has succeeded to the mining rights in a gold mining property known as the Oro Fina Mine in Placer County, California. It is alleged that on October 8, 1942, the Director General for Operations of the War Production Board "arbitrarily and without authority of law" issued a Gold Mining Order, known as Limitation Order L-208, classifying plaintiff's gold mining property as a "nonessential mine" and requiring the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases