1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 93 F.Supp.
  5. 93 F.Supp. 993 (1950)
 

MOORE v. ROSCHEN

93 F.Supp. 993 (1950)

MOORE et al. v. ROSCHEN et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

November 13, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo Gitlin, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Bondy & Schloss, New York City, for defendants E. F. Timme & Son and William E. Roschen, David E. Nierenberg and Bertram Braufman, New York City, of counsel.

Michael A. Hayes, New York City, for defendant M. A. Henry Co., Inc.

McGOHEY, District Judge.

There are two motions for summary judgment, one by defendants E. F. Timme & Son, the other by defendant M. A. Henry Co., Inc.

The infant plaintiff, a resident of Pennsylvania, seeks damages for personal injuries. He was burned when a "Gene Autry" cowboy suit he was wearing caught on fire. The suit was of a kind manufactured and sold by the defendants. The injury was sustained on September 4, 1944. This action was commenced on January...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases