Per Curiam.
There was no privity of contract between plaintiff husband and defendant Lay which would afford any basis for a recovery for loss of his wife's services and medical expenses on the theory of breach of warranty. (Gimenez v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 264 N.Y. 390, 393.)
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.