WOODS v. NADEL

Civ. A. No. 9607.

90 F.Supp. 962 (1950)

WOODS, Housing Expediter, v. NADEL et al.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

May 31, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George G. Allen, New York City, Chief, Litigation Section, Office of Housing Expediter, for plaintiff (William S. Hauser, New York City, of counsel).

Brock & Sulzberger, New York City, for defendants (Myron Sulzberger, New York City, of counsel).


BYERS, District Judge.

The Court is satisfied that the brokerage paid by the sub-lessee did not inure to the benefit of the defendants in this case, and therefore that the rent paid by the sub-lessee was not enhanced so as to violate the statute; the sub-lessee agreed to pay the brokerage, with knowledge that the tenant in possession, who desired to dispose of her lease, was unwilling to pay a commission to the real estate broker who handled the transaction for her...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases