1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 92 F.Supp.
  5. 92 F.Supp. 943 (1950)
 

KEROTEST MFG. CO. v. C-O-TWO FIRE EQUIPMENT CO.

Civ. A. No. 1300.

92 F.Supp. 943 (1950)

KEROTEST MFG. CO. v. C-O-TWO FIRE EQUIPMENT CO.

United States District Court D. Delaware.

August 18, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richards, Layton & Finger, of Wilmington, Del., Smith, Buchanan & Ingersoll, and Blenko, Hoopes, Leonard & Glenn, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Arthur G. Connolly, of Wilmington, Del., and R. Morton Adams (of Pennie, Edmonds, Morton & Barrows), of New York City, for defendant.

RODNEY, District Judge.

This case comes before the court upon two contemporaneous motions: (1) a motion of the plaintiff, Kerotest, for a preliminary injunction restraining the defendant, C-O-Two, from proceeding against Kerotest in a civil action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, which action will hereafter, for reasons of brevity, be called the Chicago action; and (2) a motion of C-O-Two praying for an order staying further...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases