1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 93 F.Supp.
  5. 93 F.Supp. 930 (1950)
 

L. W. & P. ARMSTRONG, INC. v. THE MORMACMAR

93 F.Supp. 930 (1950)

L. W. & P. ARMSTRONG, Inc. v. THE MORMACMAR et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

October 30, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hill, Rivkins & Middleton, New York City (Arthur O. Louis and Mark T. Walsh, New York City, of counsel), for libellant.

Irving H. Saypol, U. S. Atty., New York City (William H. Postner, New York City, of counsel), for respondent, United States.

Burlingham, Veeder, Clark & Hupper, New York City (Herbert M. Lord, New York City, of counsel), for respondent Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.

MEDINA, District Judge.

This matter is before me on exceptions to the report of a Special Commissioner, appointed for the purpose of determining the damages suffered by libellant following a decision on the merits in libellant's favor rendered on October 31, 1947. In my earlier opinion, reported in The Mormacmar, D.C., 75 F.Supp. 520, I held that, because of the expiration of the contractual and statutory period of limitation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases