1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 89 F.Supp.
  5. 89 F.Supp. 906 (1949)
 

BENTON v. SOUTHERN PAC. CO.

No. 27948.

89 F.Supp. 906 (1949)

BENTON et al. v. SOUTHERN PAC. CO. et al.

United States District Court N. D. California, S. D.

May 18, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John C. Alaimo and Dudley T. Shearer, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Burton Mason, Lawrence L. Howe, and W. A. Gregory, Jr., San Francisco, Cal., for defendant Southern Pac. Co.

G. B. Blanckenburg, Jacobs, Blanckenburg & May, San Francisco, Cal., Richard R. Lyman, Mulholland, Robie & McEwen, Toledo, Ohio, for intervening defendants.

GOODMAN, District Judge.

When filed, the complaint in this action set out two causes of action. In the second cause of action, plaintiffs sought a declaration that the so-called majority union1 did not have the exclusive right to represent employees of defendant railroad in investigations held pursuant to Rule 332 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement between the majority union and defendant Southern Pacific...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases