1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 86 F.Supp.
  5. 86 F.Supp. 859 (1949)
 

PRO-PHY-LAC-TIC BRUSH CO. v. HUDSON PRODUCTS

Civ. No. 9674.

86 F.Supp. 859 (1949)

PRO-PHY-LAC-TIC BRUSH CO. v. HUDSON PRODUCTS, Inc.

United States District Court D. New Jersey.

November 4, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McCarter, English & Studer, Newark, N. J., George P. Towle, Jr., Dike, Calver & Porter, Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Thomas J. Brogan, Jersey City, N. J., James F. Hoge, Lenore B. Stoughton, George M. Chapman, New York City, for defendant.

MEANEY, District Judge.

Findings of Fact

1. This is an action alleging infringement of plaintiff's trade-mark "Perma-Grip" brought under the Trademark Act of 1905, 15 U.S.C.A. § 96 (now revised 15 U.S.C.A. § 1114 et seq.).

2. Plaintiff is the owner of the registered trade-mark "Perma-Grip" for a denture powder for holding false teeth.

3. Defendant uses "Poli-Grip" as a trade-mark for a denture cream for holding false teeth.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases