1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 85 F.Supp.
  5. 85 F.Supp. 848 (1949)
 

CHESTER H. ROTH CO. v. ESQUIRE

85 F.Supp. 848 (1949)

CHESTER H. ROTH CO., Inc. v. ESQUIRE, Inc.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

June 30, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mock & Blum, New York City (Asher Blum and Alex Friedman, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City (Bruce Bromley, Harold R. Medina, Jr., and Albert Rosenblum, New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

COXE, District Judge.

This is an action, commenced January 21, 1947, for a declaratory judgment determining the rights of the parties in the use of the word "Esquire" as a trade-mark.

The plaintiff is a New York corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of men's socks under the name "Esquire"; it claims title to the mark in succession to Nickels & Lauber, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Nickels & Lauber, (Pa.)",...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases